mecu18b
Probationary Member
Posts: 2
|
Post by mecu18b on Aug 9, 2010 12:20:39 GMT -5
Hi all.... Just wondering....is the 44 tooner body the same as a short 80 tonner. Can ya take the body , add the front deck and steps and have a correct short 80 tonner? Thanks
|
|
|
Post by MitchGDRMCo on Aug 10, 2010 20:45:08 GMT -5
One word, no. To illustrate: 44T 70T 44T is 28'04" long whereas the 70T is 37'00" long.
|
|
mecu18b
Probationary Member
Posts: 2
|
Post by mecu18b on Aug 10, 2010 21:49:42 GMT -5
thanks but i said 80 tonner not 70 tonner.
|
|
|
Post by MitchGDRMCo on Aug 11, 2010 0:39:29 GMT -5
Bout double the size Id say. Or is this the one you're talking about? Or this?
|
|
|
Post by MitchGDRMCo on Aug 11, 2010 0:43:37 GMT -5
Alright dont worry about the above, did a bit more digging and it would appear the one you're referring to is the SL80, its 38' long.
|
|
|
Post by 1stcajon on Aug 31, 2010 10:28:53 GMT -5
Weren't the 44 tonners made so that only an engineer would be required. If you made it an 80 tonner configuration you'd need a fireman because of the increased weight.
|
|
|
Post by icghogger on Aug 31, 2010 11:00:21 GMT -5
Andy, you are correct, that was GE's pitch to the railroads, and it worked. A specific weight-on-drivers limit was established (by union and railroad agreement) to eliminate the fireman, and the 44-tonner was just below that limit. The ICRR used one on the "Hoodlum", a one or two-car passenger train used to ferry its workers from South Yard in Memphis to the shops and roundhouse at Nonconnah Yard (later called Johnston Yard, now Harrison Yard) south of Memphis during the late forties and early fifties. It saved the railroad the expense of an extra crew member for many years.
|
|