|
|
Post by superfleet93 on Jul 21, 2009 21:13:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by mrlfan on Jul 22, 2009 1:57:22 GMT -5
Let me know if you don't need this as I can always use another SD40 for my MRL fleet. Glenn
|
|
|
|
Post by superfleet93 on Jul 22, 2009 15:24:03 GMT -5
I gotcha Glenn!  Perry |
|
|
|
Post by mrlfan on Jul 23, 2009 1:49:42 GMT -5
Did you get a shell with the frame? Glenn
|
|
|
|
Post by superfleet93 on Jul 23, 2009 11:29:20 GMT -5
Glenn,
Yes I did, but nothing has been done to it. I am planning on scratching the sides thus fixing some Kato errors.
Perry
|
|
|
|
Post by RunningExtra on Jul 23, 2009 16:37:10 GMT -5
Perry,
You are going to be a very busy man my friend
|
|
|
|
Post by mrlfan on Jul 24, 2009 1:47:58 GMT -5
Why would you want to scratch the sides when you have to paint over it? :>)
|
|
|
|
Post by superfleet93 on Jul 24, 2009 16:41:43 GMT -5
Haha! There are some details I'm not crazy about and after building one backing sheet, building these sides from styrene is really a lot easier than I had imagined.
Perry
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 30, 2010 14:06:22 GMT -5
That model was originally planned to be an MK SD40. I liked that dark blue with gold.
|
|
deez
Chairman
Midland Belt Railway
Posts: 949
|
Post by deez on Apr 30, 2010 16:29:15 GMT -5
I agree with Brian. The MPI rebuilds were pretty stunning when they were new. I loved these when they first arrived on the SP for testing years ago.  |
|
